SIPS 2019
Editorial: Rule out conflicts of interest in psychology awards.
Stoevenbelt, A. H., Nuijten, M. B., Pauli, B. E., & Wicherts, J. M. (2019) Nature 572, 312. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02429-3
SIPS 2018
Paper: 8 Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List
Crüwell, S., Van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2018). Preprint retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/cfzyx.
Paper: The emerging relationship between clinical psychology and the credibility movement
Reardon, K. W., Corker, K. S., & Tackett, J. L. (In press). The emerging relationship between clinical psychology and the credibility movement. The Behavior Therapist. [Preprint at https://psyarxiv.com/46rk5]
Media training materials
How to communicate with journalists: https://osf.io/2dk6x/
Responsible communication with the public (including discussion of how to handle preprints): https://osf.io/7g8et/
Five questions to ask when reading science news
Strategies to identify research that is reliable: https://osf.io/qxv4n/
Tools & Tips to Manage Your Lab
A list of tools for researchers to use to help manage their students, projects, and writing reports: https://osf.io/r5my6/
SIPS 2017
Psychological Science Accelerator
The Psychological Science Accelerator is a decentralized, massive, international collaboration of psychological researchers; read more here.
Open Science Video Series (2017, with COS and SPSP)
During SIPS 2017, 5 short videos were recorded that served as an introduction to major topics within the area of open science. http://spsp.org/resources/multimedia/experts/openscience
Paper: Pros and cons of replication research
Zwaan, R. A., Etz, A., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2017). Making replications mainstream. Brain and Behavioral Sciences. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972
OA version: https://psyarxiv.com/4tg9c/
Paper: Improving peer review
Davis, W. E., Giner-Sorolla, R., Stephen Lindsay, D., Lougheed, J. P., Makel, M. C., Meier, M. E., Sun, J., Vaughn, L. A., & Zelenski, J. M. (2018). Peer-review guidelines promoting replicability and transparency in psychological science. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 556–573. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918806489
OA version: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/69135/
SIPS 2016
PsyArXiv
PsyArXiv is a preprint server for psychology; read more here.
StudySwap
StudySwap is community “swap board” for researchers to connect to share/trade resources, including study participants; read more here.
Paper: Constraints on generality (COG)
Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on Generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1123-1128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630 OA version: https://psyarxiv.com/w9e3r/
Paper: Experiences from the first ever SIPS meeting
Wyble, B. (2016). How to win friends and improve science: Notes from the first meeting of SIPS (the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science). Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 1529-1530. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1180-x