SIPS 2019
Editorial: Rule out conflicts of interest in psychology awards.
Stoevenbelt, A. H., Nuijten, M. B., Pauli, B. E., & Wicherts, J. M. (2019) Nature 572, 312. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02429-3
Tool: BrainPower – Resources for power analysis in neuroimaging
A hackathon group continues its work to develop tools for power analysis in neuroimaging. Read more here: https://brainpower.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html
Blog: A fruitful rendevous at SIPS: Neuroimagers meet study preregistration advocates
Algermissen, J., Bartlett, J., Gau, R., Heunis, S., Klapwijk, E., Mazor, M., Paul, M., Schettino, A., & Mehler, D. (2019). Blog post featuring resources for neuroimagers on preregistration, power analysis, and more.
Curation: Free, Open Datasets
Brick, C., Botzet, L., Costello, C. K., Batruch, A., Arslan, R. C., Kline, M., Sommet, N., Green, J., Nuijten, M. B., Conley, M. A., Richardson, T., Sorhagen, N., Collentine, A. O., Feldman, G., Feingold, F., Manley, H., & Mullarkey, M. C. (2019). Directory of free, open psychological datasets. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TH8EW
SIPS 2018
Tutorial: Secondary Data Analysis Pre-Registration
Van den Akker, O., Weston, S. J., Campbell, L., Chopik, W. J., Damian, R. I., Davis-Kean, P., Hall, A., Kosie, J. E., Kruse, E., Olsen, J., Ritchie, S. J., Valentine, K. D., van ‘t Veer, A. E., & Bakker, M. (2019, November 20). Preregistration of secondary data analysis: A template and tutorial. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hvfmr
Template: Secondary Data Analysis Pre-Registration
Weston, S. J., Mellor, D. T., Bakker, M., Van den Akker, O., Campbell, L., Ritchie, S. J., Chopik, W. J., Damian, R. I., Kosie, J., Soderberg, C. K., Ebersole, C. R., Brown, B., Davis-Kean, P., Hall, A., Kruse, E., Olsen, J., Valentine, K. D., & Nguyen, T. T. (2018). Secondary data preregistration. Retrieved from https://osf.io/x4gzt
Paper: 7 Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List
Crüwell, S., Van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (In press). Zeitschrift für Psychologie. Preprint retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/cfzyx.
Paper: The emerging relationship between clinical psychology and the credibility movement
Reardon, K. W., Corker, K. S., & Tackett, J. L. (In press). The emerging relationship between clinical psychology and the credibility movement. The Behavior Therapist. [Preprint at https://psyarxiv.com/46rk5]
Media training materials
How to communicate with journalists: https://osf.io/2dk6x/
Responsible communication with the public (including discussion of how to handle preprints): https://osf.io/7g8et/
Five questions to ask when reading science news
Strategies to identify research that is reliable: https://osf.io/qxv4n/
Tools & Tips to Manage Your Lab
A list of tools for researchers to use to help manage their students, projects, and writing reports: https://osf.io/r5my6/
Psych-DS
Psych-DS is an in-progress community attempt to define a standard way of formatting and documenting scientific datasets.
SIPS 2017
Psychological Science Accelerator
The Psychological Science Accelerator is a decentralized, massive, international collaboration of psychological researchers; read more here.
Open Science Video Series (2017, with COS and SPSP)
During SIPS 2017, 5 short videos were recorded that served as an introduction to major topics within the area of open science. http://spsp.org/resources/multimedia/experts/openscience
Paper: Pros and cons of replication research
Zwaan, R. A., Etz, A., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2017). Making replications mainstream. Brain and Behavioral Sciences. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972
OA version: https://psyarxiv.com/4tg9c/
Paper: Improving peer review
Davis, W. E., Giner-Sorolla, R., Stephen Lindsay, D., Lougheed, J. P., Makel, M. C., Meier, M. E., Sun, J., Vaughn, L. A., & Zelenski, J. M. (2018). Peer-review guidelines promoting replicability and transparency in psychological science. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 556–573. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918806489
OA version: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/69135/
Paper: Increasing transparency of analysis for pre-existing data
Weston, S. J., Ritchie, S. J., Rohrer, J. M., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019). Recommendations for increasing the transparency of analysis of preexisting data sets. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 214-227.
OA version: https://psyarxiv.com/zmt3q/
Taxonomy for PsyArXiv Preprints
Brown, B. T., Eerland, A., Condon, D. M., Pfeiffer, N., Hoplock, L., Columbus, S., Kline, M. E., Moshontz, H., Binion, G., Iskiwitch, C., & Forscher, P. S. (2017). Retrieved from link.
SIPS 2016
PsyArXiv
PsyArXiv is a preprint server for psychology; read more here.
StudySwap
StudySwap is community “swap board” for researchers to connect to share/trade resources, including study participants; read more here.
Paper: Constraints on generality (COG)
Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on Generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1123-1128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630 OA version: https://psyarxiv.com/w9e3r/
Paper: Experiences from the first ever SIPS meeting
Wyble, B. (2016). How to win friends and improve science: Notes from the first meeting of SIPS (the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science). Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 1529-1530. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1180-x